%@LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT" CODEPAGE="65001"%>
|
Why U.S. Workers Need the Employee Free Choice Actby Tula Connell, Feb 2, 2007
Some 60 million workers say they would join unions if they could, according to recent polling.
Yet U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data released last week point to a decline in union membership from 12.5 percent of the workforce in 2005 to 12 percent in 2006.
So what’s wrong with that picture?
It’s true, we in the union movement could be more aggressive in recruiting workers to join unions. But a big reason U.S. employees don’t join unions is because they can’t.
And America’s workers all too-often are blocked from joining unions because our nation’s labor laws, originally created in the 1930s, are broken. So broken that employers routinely harass, intimidate and even fire workers who they suspect of trying to form a union.
Let’s face it, how many people want to lose their jobs? (Firing workers for forming unions is illegal, but management does it anyway, counting on the fact that it often takes years for a workers’ appeal to wind its way through the regional and national labor boards and even the courts.)
Our nation’s labor laws need to be changed. Some 230 House members—a number that’s growing—already have signed up as co-sponsors of the Employee Free Choice Act. Rep. George Miller and Sen. Edward Kennedy have been with us on this bill from the time we first sought co-sponsors for it in 2003
The Employee Free Choice Act would:
A poll conducted in December by Peter D. Hart Research Associates showed a strong majority of the public—65 percent—approve of unions, up from 55 percent in 1981. But that same poll, taken for us at the AFL-CIO, also showed that nearly one-third of the public does not realize how hard management fights workers who seek to form unions.
In fact:
And management does more, lots more, to intimidate and harass workers seeking to form
And most import, the Employee Free Choice Act is about raising the standard of living for all of us in this nation.
As AFL-CIO Organizing Director Stewart Acuff puts it:
[There is a] direct correlation between 25 years of stagnant, flat-lined wages and the assault on unions. Forty-seven million of us are without health care and 40 million with inadequate health care, [and] 20 percent more of us [live] in poverty now than when this decade started.
***********************************
Laura Garren, a nurse at Mercy Medical Center in Roseburg, Ore., has been delivering and taking care of babies for 20 years. About two years ago, she began to worry about increasingly inadequate staffing levels having an adverse effect on patient care. Garren says they were short 40 nurses and the situation was getting worse. Eager to turn things around at Mercy, Garren and her coworkers began forming a union with the Oregon Nurses Association/United American Nurses to gain a voice in the decisions affecting their work and to ensure quality patient care. But the hospital was not interested in letting the nurses make a free choice. Management fought back with a campaign of fear and misinformation. Making the staffing ratio even worse, nurses were pulled off the floor and forced to attend anti-union meetings during work time. Garren remembers thinking to herself:
While I’m here at this mandatory meeting, the nurse upstairs who is covering my patients, now has 12 patients.
What does that say for management’s priorities? Or, for that matter, what does it say about the priorities of this nation?
******************************************
In 2005, a group of Nobel Peace Laureates, including the Rev. Desmond Tutu, former Polish President and Solidarnosc leader Lech Walesa, former President Jimmy Carter and the Dalai Lama, issued a joint statement calling every nation, including the United States, to “truly protect and defend workers’ rights, including the right to form unions and bargain collectively.” In their statement, the Nobel Laureates lambasted this nation’s refusal to ensure the basic Freedom of Assembly guaranteed in the Bill of Rights, writing:
Even the wealthiest nation in the world—the United States of America—fails to adequately protect workers’ rights to form unions and bargain collectively. Millions of U.S. workers lack any legal protection to form unions and thousands are discriminated against every year for trying to exercise these rights.
[http://blog.aflcio.org/2007/02/02/why-us-workers-need-the-employee-free-choice-act/]
|
America’s workers want to form unions. Research shows nearly 60 million would form a union tomorrow if given the chance. |
|
Too few ever get that chance because employers routinely block their efforts to form unions—and our current legal system is too broken to stop them. As many as one-quarter of employers illegally fire workers who try to form unions. |
|
The Employee Free Choice Act would give workers a fair chance to form unions to improve their lives by:
|
|
In the 110th Congress, the Employee Free Choice Act has widespread support. |
|
More than three-quarters of Americans—77 percent—support strong laws that give employees the freedom to make their own choice about whether to have a union in their workplace without interference from management (PDF). |
|
Allowing working people to choose for themselves whether to have a union is the key step toward rebuilding America’s middle class. Union membership brings better wages and benefits and a real voice on the job (PDF). It’s no accident that the 25-year decline in workers’ wages in our country has paralleled a 25-year slide in the size of the America’s unions. |
|
The Employee Free Choice Act would put democracy back into the workplace. Majority sign-up would ensure the decision whether to form a union was made by majority choice, not by the employer unilaterally. |
|
Workers can still vote under the Employee Free Choice Act. At any time, if 30 percent of the workers want an election, they can have one. And once they have a union, workers also vote to elect their union representatives. |
|
The Employee Free Choice Act has the support of hundreds of respected organizations and individuals—major religious denominations, academics and civil and human rights groups and others. |
|
The AFL-CIO union movement is working in many ways to restore good jobs, health care and retirement security—but passing the Employee Free Choice Act is our top priority because we cannot create balance for working people or rebuild the middle class unless workers genuinely have the freedom to form unions for a better life. |